COMPARING ACCOUNTS OF ENGLISH WH-QUESTIONS ACQUISITION BY MONOLINGUALS AND BILINGUALS UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS

Keywords: bilinguals, EFL learners, monolinguals, universal factors, wh-questions acquisition.

Abstract

The comparison of English wh-questions acquisition by monolinguals, bilinguals and EFL learners showed inter-groups similarities, which included wh-questions formulaic use, overgeneralization, non-inverted structures, archiforms, double marking of auxiliaries and past tense. The authors suggest a special role of there is/are structures in the wh-questions acquisition by EFL learners. The research results allow assuming the impact of universal factors upon the process of wh-questions acquisition irrespective of the learners’ age, onset of the bilingualism, if they acquire English as the first or the second language, or whether it is acquired in the formal or informal environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambridge, B., Rowland, C., Theakston, A., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Comparing different accounts of inversion errors in children's non-subject wh-questions: ‘What experimental data can tell us?’. Journal of Child Language, 33(3), 519–557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000906007513

Contemori, C., Carlson, M., & Marinis, T. (2018). On-line processing of English which-questions by children and adults: A visual world paradigm study. Journal of Child Language, 45(2), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000917000277

Ingram, D. (1989). First language acquisition: method, description, and explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marcus, G.F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T.J., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), 1–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115

Roesch, A., & Chondrogianni, V. (2016). “Which mouse kissed the frog?” Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 635–661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000916000015

Rowland, C., & Pine, J. (2000). Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ Journal of Child Language, 27(1), 157–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000999004055

Rowland, C., & Pine, J. (2003). The development of inversion in wh-questions: A reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005445

Valiant, V., Casey, L. (2003). Young children's acquisition of wh-questions: the role of structured input. Journal of Child Language, 30(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000902005457

Van Valin, R. (2002). The development of subject–auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: An alternative analysis. Journal of Child Language, 29(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000901004974


Abstract views: 43
PDF Downloads: 33 PDF Downloads: 2 PDF Downloads: 2
Published
2021-12-17
How to Cite
Chernovaty, L., & Kovalchuk, N. (2021). COMPARING ACCOUNTS OF ENGLISH WH-QUESTIONS ACQUISITION BY MONOLINGUALS AND BILINGUALS UNDER VARIOUS CONDITIONS. Psycholinguistics in a Modern World, 16, 308-312. https://doi.org/10.31470/10.31470/2706-7904-2021-16-308-312